E46 Fanatics Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.

M56 Valve Cover onto M54 (CCV mod)

2 reading
463K views 1.7K replies 132 participants last post by  Archbid  
#1 ·
Totally off base here but I was wondering if anyone has eliminated the CCV PITA by switching to the M56 valve cover (for the SULEV) where the oil separator is built into the valve cover.

Benefits:

Aluminum Valve cover:
- less chance of warping, cracks etc.
- less chance of VCG leaks

CCV maintenance ease
- CCV built into VC
- no more ridiculous contorting and removal of half the engine bay to get at CCV
- One outlet pipe to intake - simplified catch can setup.
- replaceable rubber diaphragm for OS repair.

Frozen CCV/Mayo
- being built into the VC there is little chance the rubber diaphram or pipe will freeze before it drains (as engine is still warm) . If it did freeze from buildup it will also thaw better as the engine warms unlike the separate CCV on the M54 that remains frozen after the engine warms.

Rather than fork out another $150 for a new CCV kit I'm thinking of spending $500 and buying the M56 Valve cover.

I realize I'll have to replace the plastic BMW cover over the VC and a new vent hose.

Anyone see any issues with this mod? Are there any fitment issues I might not have considered?

Image
 

Attachments

#4 ·
Little over a month ago, I spotted a M56 car at a local pick and pull junk yard. I grabbed the valve cover and dipstick , along with 6 brand new coil packs , for the unheard of sum of 43 bucks. The plastic diaphragm in the valve cover has a hole in it and needs to be replaced. It's a very small hole it it, maybe I can fix it with some right stuff and then see it it will work. I'll be putting this cover on , when weather gets a bit warmer. I have a couple of different ideas on this for now. One I started working on last night. I'm using modeling clay to make a mold of the area under the CCV cap on the cover. Once the mold is made, I plan on pouring urethane rubber for the fitted part to go into the cavity on the cap, then hook up a PCV valve, right on top of the cap and let that be the fix for vacuum control.
 
#20 ·
We'll probably all die waiting on that lol
 
Save
#19 · (Edited)
#18 · (Edited)
Thanks Solidjake, is I have seen pics of m56 valve covers and for some reason they seem to have 2 oil caps.

I figure that's what I was seeing on my oil cap, as after replacing the motor, I went for a short test drive and had what you just described, I was a bit worried thinking the motor installed could have a bad headgasket, but upon taking a long drive it was gone and figured was just condensation. It is fairly cold here and constantly changing weather.

To the OP, good luck. I'll be thinking of this as next mod.
 
#23 ·
Am only in CT until june, then is back to AZ for me lol. Although I lived in Ct for 12yrs all my other cars werent picky as the bmw's so didnt had this condensation issue until now. But hey always good to learn new things, but even though am moving am still considering this m54 to m56 swao as it looks better too.
 
#25 ·
On purchasing the diaphragm for the CCV, do you have any info on where to buy the part , and maybe a part number? I've been searching for almost a month and haven't found the spot to make this happen.
On the urethane rubber pouring, the material that I'm using is the same stuff that is used when pouring urethane bushings for suspensions. It's extremely hard and should hold up for the job. If it doesn't, I'll use my mold and have a machinist turn me one out of aluminum.
 
#27 · (Edited)
Don't understand the mayo issue, I don't drive very much and when I do its short trips. Never mayoed anything anywhere. When I capitulated to e46fan paranoia and changed the crankcase vent plumbing out for the updated parts including the dipstick tube I observed no evidence whatsoever of mayo or condensate or impending failure of the original parts. Those parts were just fine when replaced.


Sent from my iPhone using E46Fanatics mobile app
 
Save
#40 ·
Seeing as how many of these M56's are going to get junked in the next couple of years due to the integrated fuel-pump dying ($6000 repair job), I think that the availability of the M56 valve covers should be increasing. This seems like a great solution, and it's not something they added in new models. My e34 525, with a M50 engine had the ccv integrated in the valve cover as well.
 
#43 ·
Some things that I have just learned. The M56 valve cover (lets call it an update) update has some down sides for certain vehicles. You have to get the coil packs for the M56 as well for the older production M54's. When you change the coil packs, the plugs are different which would require a coil harness. On changing the coil harness, the wire pin outs are different. The new vehicles don't have this problem but the older production vehicles might get a CEL. From the harness change, there is one thick wire that has no where to go in the new coil pack harness set up. The alternative may be to keep your harness and add the coil pack connector plugs to your existing harness using the correct pin out for the new coils. Also have to check to see if the resistance between the 2 different coils are close enough to not over heat the drivers in the DME. Research research research. But in the end the clean setup (for me) is what I am looking for.
 
#46 ·
By older style coils you mean the ones that get bolted into place? And the m56 valve cover uses the coils that just push in, correct?
 
Save
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.