EDITS IN BOLD BLACK TYPE (wanted to make some updates to the OP)
Some of this may be known to some old farts (e46 tenure, not age) on the forum, but I haven't heard anyone talk about it so I thought I would start a (rare for me) thread on my window regulator issues, and what I think most people are missing with regard to why they fail.
My window regulator issues started the day I bought my used 2003 325i Sedan with a failure of the driver rear window. Most of the problems are with sedans which I will talk more about later. In the few years since I bought it, I have replaced all but the passenger rear (which is making some clicking noise so I think it is soon to be replaced), and the front driver I have replaced 3 times. This is unacceptable to me. For the record, I had window regulator issues with my wife's Honda Odyssey (both passenger side) also, which is a similar design to the e46: cable/pulley/track system rather than the older scissor jack style (which works still without issue on my son's '98 Olds Cutlass). The scissor jack style and the old gear/crank lever style are far superior to the cable/pulley/track system but is probably more difficult and expensive to implement on a production vehicle hence our burden.
The theory I see most often posted on here are
1: That aftermarket regulators are junk (and I agree SOME of them are),
2: That the sedan is just a bad design, and
3: That the fur lined rubber window tracks lose their fur as they age and become high dynamic friction systems. (For those of you who don't know what dynamic friction is, it is the moving friction. Static friction is the friction that must be overcome in order to get the system moving. I am not trying to be condescending with any explanations, just want to make sure my terms aren't confusing to some).
I offer an alternate theory based on my several years of observation: Failure of window regulators in a cable/pulley/track system is due to extensive static friction during initial roll-down, not increased dynamic friction (though it is prudent to keep dynamic friction to a minimum). Also - poor quality window regulators do not have enough tension in the cables, and therefore slack can accumulate either in the main spool or near the pulleys. This can cause the cable to come off the pulley or spool and become wrapped around the motor drive spline.
Finding root cause of failure is my business. What I mean by that is that my profession to do so. I work for a major supplier to the aviation industry and my company counts on me to determine why $hit fails. Not blowing wind up my own azz, just trying to add some credence to my theory. I'm not just some joker off the street with a theory, though there are plenty of people off the street with good knowledge and significant things to offer, just as there are plenty of professionals that don't know squat.
My observations that led me to this conclusion are both direct observation, as well as comments from people on this forum.
Let's start with my first observation: when I roll my windows down after not doing so for a while (days), there is a significant "pop" as the static friction breaks loose, as if the window was glued in place at the upper rubber seal and the motor had to break it free. Also if I roll my windows back up and do it again, no "pop." So let's think about what happens when the window is stuck due to high static friction and we roll it down. The first thing is the motor moves but the window doesn't. This is possible because of the spring loaded tensioners in the cable system. The next thing that happens is the springs compress then bottom out which gives the motor drive the ability to overcome the static friction of the top window/seal area and the window breaks free. Suddenly the spring and all the tension in the system releases which can result in slack in the cable briefly. Depending on where the cable slack ends up can determine if the unit fails or not (cable jumping off the pulleys or spool). The last three regulator failures that I have had are because the cable jumped its spool (the thing the motor engages to, a nylon spool that the cable wraps around). The cable then becomes wrapped around the motor drive spline and boom: the system binds up and stops. All of my failures occur when I roll the window down, it sounds slow, then when I go to roll them up it binds and stops. I have noticed that some of the cheap aftermarket units (Hamburg Technic for one) have a significant gap between the spool and the galvanized steel plate (see next picture) which is undesirable as it does not contain the briefly loose cable as good as one with no gap or a small gap. This allows room for the cable to come out of its enclosure. The latest one I put in was a Uro Premium and it seems to be much better in that area with little to no gap. The Uro Premium is the one with ball bearings to reduce dynamic friction, but this isn't why I bought it. I bought it because of the warranty and because the gap looked to be much smaller in the picture (and I can verify that it is significantly smaller, see the second picture below). I have since learned that the design concept for the ball bearing was so that the cable can be tighter to help to keep the cables from jumping the pulleys and spool, and that the pulley design has a deeper groove to keep the cable from jumping off. This in itself are good changes, but have not led to a failure free design as you will read later in this thread.There has been two iterations of the Uro Premium Regulator, the first had tighter cables but still had some failures, the second the cables were tightened more... we will see if they hold up. These features are probably what sets the OE regulators apart from the aftermarket ones. Hopefully the newest iteration of the Uro Premium can perform like the OE unit, if not I will be switching to OE next go-around.
Hamburg Technic:
<a href="http://s1090.photobucket.com/user/yewzer/media/bad%20gap%20reg.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1090.photobucket.com/albums/i370/yewzer/bad%20gap%20reg.jpg" border="0" alt="Hamburg Technic photo bad gap reg.jpg"/></a>
Uro Premium:
<a href="http://s1090.photobucket.com/user/yewzer/media/good%20gap%20reg.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1090.photobucket.com/albums/i370/yewzer/good%20gap%20reg.jpg" border="0" alt="Uro Premium photo good gap reg.jpg"/></a>
My second observation involves why coupe's and verts suffer far less from this problem. My theory is two-fold. 1, the rubber seal may be different (I don't have a coupe handy to look at closely) and not as tight. (and I have learned that the whole regulator and track system is very different) 2, the coupe (and vert) roll the windows down slightly every time you open the door. This along with opening the door breaks the static friction daily while it is low, and doesn't give it days to allow the window to adhere to the rubber seal.
My third observation is that I have window tint. The window tint is cut very high on the glass which allows the tint material to go into the window seal area. I believe this window tint material makes the static friction issue worse. I am even more convinced of this after a couple of weeks with them trimmed down as outlined later in this post.
So what can we do about it...? I don't know all the answers but I have some ideas.
The first thing I did was cut the window tint down lower on the glass so it is outside of the seal, which I have done very recently (about 2-3 days before I started this thread). This can be done at a height that will not allow light in the top when closed but low enough to keep it out of the seal. What I did is use the witness mark from the seal on the window tint and cut a few mm's below that. If you are a perfectionist don't do this yourself, it is very difficult to get that line straight and clean on a fully cured tint. I will need new tint sometime soon so I took a chance in order to perform this test. The glass on the top edge of the window needs to be clean and free of any build-up. I think the build-up that I had was residue from window tint adhesive and plain and simple grime. When I say build-up I'm not talking about a giant glob of goo, just a thin line of something right where the window seal touches on the inside of the window. See the next two pictures for before and after cutting the tint down. When I get new tint I will request the tint be cut to a specific spot as well.
Tint before cutting. Note that you can see the build up, or witness mark where the window curves down (sorry for the bad pics):
<a href="http://s1090.photobucket.com/user/yewzer/media/tint%20before%20cut.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1090.photobucket.com/albums/i370/yewzer/tint%20before%20cut.jpg" border="0" alt="Tint Before Cut photo tint before cut.jpg"/></a>
Tint after cutting:
<a href="http://s1090.photobucket.com/user/yewzer/media/tint%20after%20cut.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1090.photobucket.com/albums/i370/yewzer/tint%20after%20cut.jpg" border="0" alt="Tint After Cut photo tint after cut.jpg"/></a>
Third the top seal of the windows must be lubricated and cleaned to keep them from becoming sticky. B'laster the Dry Lube is the best we have found. Shin Etsu Grease can be used in the rubber tracks on the sides of the windows.
I did all of these steps to my windows only a few days ago and so far the pop noise is greatly reduced. And still is a few months later
This thread is not intended to be a final answer, but a living document that I will update from time-to-time. At the moment, I have a new regulator in the driver door, and regulators that are about 1-2 years old in the driver rear and passenger front doors, and an unknown in the passenger rear. My intent is to keep the static friction to a minimum through cleaning and regular conditioning of the rubber seal (probably every time I wash my car) and see how long I can make the regulators last.
Wish me luck and bump this thread if you are wondering if my regulators are holding up.
Feedback, alternate theories, rubber conditioner tips, "duh," and middle fingers welcome. :thumbsup:
Future additions to this original post will be in post number 190 as there is a limited number of edits one can do
Some of this may be known to some old farts (e46 tenure, not age) on the forum, but I haven't heard anyone talk about it so I thought I would start a (rare for me) thread on my window regulator issues, and what I think most people are missing with regard to why they fail.
My window regulator issues started the day I bought my used 2003 325i Sedan with a failure of the driver rear window. Most of the problems are with sedans which I will talk more about later. In the few years since I bought it, I have replaced all but the passenger rear (which is making some clicking noise so I think it is soon to be replaced), and the front driver I have replaced 3 times. This is unacceptable to me. For the record, I had window regulator issues with my wife's Honda Odyssey (both passenger side) also, which is a similar design to the e46: cable/pulley/track system rather than the older scissor jack style (which works still without issue on my son's '98 Olds Cutlass). The scissor jack style and the old gear/crank lever style are far superior to the cable/pulley/track system but is probably more difficult and expensive to implement on a production vehicle hence our burden.
The theory I see most often posted on here are
1: That aftermarket regulators are junk (and I agree SOME of them are),
2: That the sedan is just a bad design, and
3: That the fur lined rubber window tracks lose their fur as they age and become high dynamic friction systems. (For those of you who don't know what dynamic friction is, it is the moving friction. Static friction is the friction that must be overcome in order to get the system moving. I am not trying to be condescending with any explanations, just want to make sure my terms aren't confusing to some).
I offer an alternate theory based on my several years of observation: Failure of window regulators in a cable/pulley/track system is due to extensive static friction during initial roll-down, not increased dynamic friction (though it is prudent to keep dynamic friction to a minimum). Also - poor quality window regulators do not have enough tension in the cables, and therefore slack can accumulate either in the main spool or near the pulleys. This can cause the cable to come off the pulley or spool and become wrapped around the motor drive spline.
Finding root cause of failure is my business. What I mean by that is that my profession to do so. I work for a major supplier to the aviation industry and my company counts on me to determine why $hit fails. Not blowing wind up my own azz, just trying to add some credence to my theory. I'm not just some joker off the street with a theory, though there are plenty of people off the street with good knowledge and significant things to offer, just as there are plenty of professionals that don't know squat.
My observations that led me to this conclusion are both direct observation, as well as comments from people on this forum.
Let's start with my first observation: when I roll my windows down after not doing so for a while (days), there is a significant "pop" as the static friction breaks loose, as if the window was glued in place at the upper rubber seal and the motor had to break it free. Also if I roll my windows back up and do it again, no "pop." So let's think about what happens when the window is stuck due to high static friction and we roll it down. The first thing is the motor moves but the window doesn't. This is possible because of the spring loaded tensioners in the cable system. The next thing that happens is the springs compress then bottom out which gives the motor drive the ability to overcome the static friction of the top window/seal area and the window breaks free. Suddenly the spring and all the tension in the system releases which can result in slack in the cable briefly. Depending on where the cable slack ends up can determine if the unit fails or not (cable jumping off the pulleys or spool). The last three regulator failures that I have had are because the cable jumped its spool (the thing the motor engages to, a nylon spool that the cable wraps around). The cable then becomes wrapped around the motor drive spline and boom: the system binds up and stops. All of my failures occur when I roll the window down, it sounds slow, then when I go to roll them up it binds and stops. I have noticed that some of the cheap aftermarket units (Hamburg Technic for one) have a significant gap between the spool and the galvanized steel plate (see next picture) which is undesirable as it does not contain the briefly loose cable as good as one with no gap or a small gap. This allows room for the cable to come out of its enclosure. The latest one I put in was a Uro Premium and it seems to be much better in that area with little to no gap. The Uro Premium is the one with ball bearings to reduce dynamic friction, but this isn't why I bought it. I bought it because of the warranty and because the gap looked to be much smaller in the picture (and I can verify that it is significantly smaller, see the second picture below). I have since learned that the design concept for the ball bearing was so that the cable can be tighter to help to keep the cables from jumping the pulleys and spool, and that the pulley design has a deeper groove to keep the cable from jumping off. This in itself are good changes, but have not led to a failure free design as you will read later in this thread.There has been two iterations of the Uro Premium Regulator, the first had tighter cables but still had some failures, the second the cables were tightened more... we will see if they hold up. These features are probably what sets the OE regulators apart from the aftermarket ones. Hopefully the newest iteration of the Uro Premium can perform like the OE unit, if not I will be switching to OE next go-around.
Hamburg Technic:
<a href="http://s1090.photobucket.com/user/yewzer/media/bad%20gap%20reg.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1090.photobucket.com/albums/i370/yewzer/bad%20gap%20reg.jpg" border="0" alt="Hamburg Technic photo bad gap reg.jpg"/></a>
Uro Premium:
<a href="http://s1090.photobucket.com/user/yewzer/media/good%20gap%20reg.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1090.photobucket.com/albums/i370/yewzer/good%20gap%20reg.jpg" border="0" alt="Uro Premium photo good gap reg.jpg"/></a>
My second observation involves why coupe's and verts suffer far less from this problem. My theory is two-fold. 1, the rubber seal may be different (I don't have a coupe handy to look at closely) and not as tight. (and I have learned that the whole regulator and track system is very different) 2, the coupe (and vert) roll the windows down slightly every time you open the door. This along with opening the door breaks the static friction daily while it is low, and doesn't give it days to allow the window to adhere to the rubber seal.
My third observation is that I have window tint. The window tint is cut very high on the glass which allows the tint material to go into the window seal area. I believe this window tint material makes the static friction issue worse. I am even more convinced of this after a couple of weeks with them trimmed down as outlined later in this post.
So what can we do about it...? I don't know all the answers but I have some ideas.
The first thing I did was cut the window tint down lower on the glass so it is outside of the seal, which I have done very recently (about 2-3 days before I started this thread). This can be done at a height that will not allow light in the top when closed but low enough to keep it out of the seal. What I did is use the witness mark from the seal on the window tint and cut a few mm's below that. If you are a perfectionist don't do this yourself, it is very difficult to get that line straight and clean on a fully cured tint. I will need new tint sometime soon so I took a chance in order to perform this test. The glass on the top edge of the window needs to be clean and free of any build-up. I think the build-up that I had was residue from window tint adhesive and plain and simple grime. When I say build-up I'm not talking about a giant glob of goo, just a thin line of something right where the window seal touches on the inside of the window. See the next two pictures for before and after cutting the tint down. When I get new tint I will request the tint be cut to a specific spot as well.
Tint before cutting. Note that you can see the build up, or witness mark where the window curves down (sorry for the bad pics):
<a href="http://s1090.photobucket.com/user/yewzer/media/tint%20before%20cut.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1090.photobucket.com/albums/i370/yewzer/tint%20before%20cut.jpg" border="0" alt="Tint Before Cut photo tint before cut.jpg"/></a>
Tint after cutting:
<a href="http://s1090.photobucket.com/user/yewzer/media/tint%20after%20cut.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i1090.photobucket.com/albums/i370/yewzer/tint%20after%20cut.jpg" border="0" alt="Tint After Cut photo tint after cut.jpg"/></a>
Third the top seal of the windows must be lubricated and cleaned to keep them from becoming sticky. B'laster the Dry Lube is the best we have found. Shin Etsu Grease can be used in the rubber tracks on the sides of the windows.
I did all of these steps to my windows only a few days ago and so far the pop noise is greatly reduced. And still is a few months later
This thread is not intended to be a final answer, but a living document that I will update from time-to-time. At the moment, I have a new regulator in the driver door, and regulators that are about 1-2 years old in the driver rear and passenger front doors, and an unknown in the passenger rear. My intent is to keep the static friction to a minimum through cleaning and regular conditioning of the rubber seal (probably every time I wash my car) and see how long I can make the regulators last.
Wish me luck and bump this thread if you are wondering if my regulators are holding up.
Feedback, alternate theories, rubber conditioner tips, "duh," and middle fingers welcome. :thumbsup:
Future additions to this original post will be in post number 190 as there is a limited number of edits one can do